A political PR engagement should create a controlled system for public communication, not merely promise “positive coverage.” The agency should establish the candidate narrative, media map, spokesperson rules, approval process, monitoring vocabulary, crisis levels, response ownership, correction workflow, and reporting cadence. Every deliverable should distinguish earned coverage from paid placement and verified media outcomes from estimated reach.
What should be in the monthly scope?
A media landscape brief, message and talking-point updates, press calendar, journalist outreach log, briefing preparation, daily or weekly coverage digest, sentiment review, misinformation queue, crisis-response availability, spokesperson coaching, and a monthly report linking activity to published coverage and narrative movement.
How should media monitoring work?
Monitor the candidate, party, constituency, opponents, recurring issues, misspellings, Tamil and English variants, local television, print, web, YouTube, X, Facebook, and public messaging channels. Each alert needs source, reach context, factual status, risk level, recommended action, owner, and resolution—not every negative mention requires a public reply.
Which pricing model is appropriate?
A monthly retainer suits continuous media relations and monitoring; a defined project fee suits a launch, event, manifesto, or profile-building programme; and a crisis-readiness retainer may cover preparedness plus an activation fee. Require separate disclosure of travel, production, monitoring software, media buying, third-party distribution, and taxes.
What are the clearest warning signs?
Avoid guaranteed favourable coverage, undisclosed paid placements presented as editorial, fabricated endorsements, anonymous teams, no approval log, no correction process, vague “reach” reports, pressure to attack private individuals, or an agency working for opposing candidates without a transparent conflict policy.